Search results
Facts. Petitioner Massiah, a merchant seaman, along with a conspirator Colson, were indicted for narcotics offenses. Both pled not guilty and were released on bail. Colson, without petitioner’s knowledge, decided to cooperate with the government.
Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language. Get Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court. The petitioner was indicted for violating the federal narcotics laws. He retained a lawyer, pleaded not guilty, and was released on bail. While he was free on bail, a federal agent succeeded by surreptitious means in listening to incriminating statements made by him.
Massiah v. United States Case Brief Summary: A merchant seaman was accused of violating federal drug laws and confessed while out on bail, but the confession was overheard secretly by law enforcement agents.
Oct 19, 2020 · The Supreme Court addressed that issue in Massiah versus United States. Winston Massiah and others conspired to import cocaine from Chile into the United States on a ship. Once the ship...
- 2 min
- 1578
- Quimbee
United States, 377 U.S. 201 (U.S. May 18, 1964) Brief Fact Summary. Petitioner was recorded by a co-conspirator with the aid of the authorities. Evidence was exculpatory. Synopsis of Rule of Law.
People also ask
What happened in Massiah v United States?
Who recorded Massiah v United States?
Who was indicted in Massiah v United States?
How did Massiah get convicted?
A cellmate who had been indicted—or for whom adversary proceedings had otherwise commenced—would be protected by Massiah doctrine, which applies regardless of whether a suspect is in custody. In Brewer v. Williams, the Court was forced to decide whether to apply the Massiah doctrine in the case of a murder of a ten-year-old child.
