Yahoo Web Search

  1. Italic languages - Wikipedia › wiki › Italic_languages

    Besides Latin, the known ancient Italic languages are Faliscan (the closest to Latin), Umbrian and Oscan (or Osco-Umbrian), and South Picene. Other Indo-European languages once spoken in the peninsula, whose inclusion in the Italic branch is disputed, are Aequian, Vestinian, Venetic and Sicel.

    • Classification

      The following classification, proposed by Michiel de Vaan,...

    • History

      Proto-Italic was probably originally spoken by Italic tribes...

    • Origin theories

      The main debate concerning the origin of the Italic...

    • Characteristics

      General and specific characteristics of the pre-Roman Italic...

    • Latino-Faliscan

      The Latino-Faliscan or Latino-Venetic languages form a group...

    • Venetic

      Venetic is a centum language. The inscriptions use a variety...

  2. Italic languages - Simple English Wikipedia, the free ... › wiki › Italic_languages

    The Italic languages are a branch of the Indo-European language family. They were first spoken in Italy. The main language was Latin, which eventually turned into the Romance languages spoken today. The Roman Empire spread Latin to much of Western Europe. Today, the main Italic languages spoken are Spanish, French, Portuguese, Italian, and ...

  3. Category:Italic languages - Wikipedia › wiki › Category:Italic_languages

    The other Italic languages became extinct in the first centuries AD, as their speakers were assimilated into the Roman Empire and shifted to some form of Latin. Between the third and eighth centuries AD, Vulgar Latin (perhaps influenced by language-shift from the other Italic languages) diversified into the Romance languages , which are the ...

    • 811.12
  4. Gallo-Italic languages - Wikipedia › wiki › Gallo-Italic_languages

    Gallo-Italic languages From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Gallo-Italic, Gallo-Italian, Gallo-Cisalpine or simply Cisalpine languages constitute the majority of the Romance languages of northern Italy. They are Piedmontese, Lombard, Emilian, Ligurian, and Romagnol.

  5. Talk:Italic languages - Wikipedia › wiki › Talk:Italic_languages
    • Italic Peoples
    • studied?
    • The Hierarchy
    • Extinct? Really?
    • Dead Or Alive - The Case of Friulian
    • Extinct?
    • Sicel and Oenotrian
    • External Links Modified
    • Raetian/Raetic?
    • Latin "Duo" Is Without Macron

    I've seen the peoples speaking Italic languages being referred to as Italic peoples. I still don't know much about these peoples besides the Romans, though. Gringo30011:00, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

    I've been studying Latin for several years now. Has anyone on here studied the other Italic languages? 1. They're rather scarcely attested afaik. There just isn't enough corpus left for a thorough understanding of these languages. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 13:17, 21 February 2009 (UTC) Relation between [Romance_languages] and [Italic_languages]? Acconding to the entry on romance languages, it's a subfamily of italic language, but the italic language page thosen't mention them. Which one is right? 1. Yes, they are mentioned: 1.1. As Rome extended its political dominion over the whole of the Italian peninsula, so too did Latin become dominant over the other Italic languages, which ceased to be spoken perhaps sometime in the 1st century AD. From so-called Vulgar Latin the Romance languages emerged. bogdan ʤjuʃkə | Talk16:12, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) The page presents Italo-Celtic as a fact when actually it's more of a hypothesis (and though I'm no expert, I don't think it's a particularly popular hyp...

    Why, in the infobox, is Romance shown as a sibling of Latino-Faliscan when the Romance languages are descendants of Latin, itself a descendant of Latino-Faliscan? —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:03, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

    I'm tired of everyone saying latin is a dead language. It is the language of science, medicine and law. A pre-cursor to so many languages, an understanding of latin will give ANYONE an advantage ANYWHERE language skills are needed. I submit that we use a better word than extinct. Just because a language is not spoken now-adays does not mean it is dead. (talk) 01:31, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 1. That is the definition of the expression "dead language" so, yes, it does mean that, despite your perfectly true observations. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC) 2. I would like to see a person speaking Latin with correct pronunciation. Dude, Latin is dead! Language of science? Replaceable. Languages are living and developing over time. This is fairly natural. Why do you learn a dead root language to understand other languages better? Latin does not help you as much as you think. In my country, we have to choose between learning French or Latin at school and the tendency for Lat...

    The article on Friulian says it is an Italic language. However, the article on Itlaic languages lists the romance languages and "extinct languages". Friulian is not a Romance language, so logic would make one reason that it must be included under the reference to extinct languages. However, Friulian is alive and kicking and has a thriving community on the Wikipedia! --Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 18:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC) 1. FYI general: someone changed the Friulian article to make it a Romance language. Nice catch Correia, you ought to do more on WP.Dave (talk) 02:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

    Is there any non-Romance Italic language still alive? Kanzler31 (talk) 06:18, 5 December 2010 (UTC) 1. No. --Taivo (talk) 06:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC) 1. 1.1. Yes. See Griko language (talk) 00:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC) 1. 1.1. 1.1.1. The anonymous IP obviously doesn't have a clue about what he is saying since "Griko" is a dialect of Greek and not an Italic language at all. --Taivo (talk) 06:23, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

    The list is incomplete: Sicel is attested in inscripitions and mentioned even by Varro in his De Lingua Latina: it belonged in the Latino-Faliscan group. Oenotrians too were possibly a Latino-Falsican speaking people.Aldrasto11 (talk) 12:45, 4 February 2012 (UTC) 1. IIRC, Rix also mentions that a Latino-Faliscan dialect was originally spoken in the town of Caere, besides Etruscan, and I seem to recall that Auruncan, the dialect of the Latin tribe of the Aurunci, attested in the Garigliano Bowl, is sometimes considered a separate language or variety. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 13:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC) It seems there is not enough changes from PIE, because applying those rules one can't convert PIE *h₂ŕ̥ḱtos to latin ursus. Only arktos has appeared: #HRC → #aRC91.76.135.242 (talk) 16:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC) 1. Latin ursus is an unsolved problem. Rix's law predicts **ar-, that's true. The s is probably regular, see Thorn cluster. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 13:36, 10 August 2016 (UTC)...

    Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified 2 external links on Italic languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQfor additional information. I made the following changes: 1. Added archive to 2. Added archive to When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, oth...

    The caption for the coloured diagram of languages in Italy refers to 'Raetian', but the diagram itself refers to 'Raetic'. I don't know which is correct, but the same term should surely be used in both cases. (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

    at least according to wiktionary, it is with a short o — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 11:01, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

  6. Proto-Italic language - Wikipedia › wiki › Proto-Italic_language
    • Overview
    • History
    • Phonology
    • Grammar
    • Development

    The Proto-Italic language is the ancestor of the Italic languages, most notably Latin and its descendants, the Romance languages. It is not directly attested in writing, but has been reconstructed to some degree through the comparative method. Proto-Italic descended from the earlier Proto-Indo-European language.

    Based on glottochronological evidence, Proto-Italic is believed to have split off from the archaic western Proto-Indo-European dialects some time before 2500 BC. It was originally spoken by Italic tribes north of the Alps before they moved south into the Italian Peninsula during the second half of the 2nd millennium BCE. Linguistic evidence also points to early contacts with Celtic tribes and Proto-Germanic speakers. Although an equation between archeological and linguistic evidence cannot be es

    Proto-Italic words may have had a fixed stress on the first syllable, a stress pattern which probably existed in most descendants in at least some periods. In Latin, initial stress is posited for the Old Latin period, after which it gave way to the "Classical" stress pattern. How

    Adjectives inflected much the same as nouns. Unlike nouns, adjectives did not have inherent genders. Instead, they inflected for all three genders, taking on the same gender-form as the noun they referred to. Adjectives followed the same inflectional classes of nouns. The largest

    A list of regular phonetic changes from Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Italic follows. Because Latin is the only well-attested Italic language, it forms the main source for the reconstruction of Proto-Italic. It is therefore not always clear whether certain changes apply to all of Italic, or only to Latin, because of lack of conclusive evidence.

  7. Italic peoples - Wikipedia › wiki › Italic_peoples

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Italic peoples were an ethnolinguistic group identified by their use of Italic languages a branch of the Indo-European language family. The Italic peoples are descended from the Indo-European speaking peoples who inhabited Italy from at least the second millennium BC onwards.

  8. This is an audio version of the Wikipedia Article:Italic languagesListening is a more natural way of learning, when compared to reading. Written language onl...

    • 29 min
    • 275
    • wikipedia tts
  9. Category:Italic languages - Wiktionary › wiki › Category:Italic_languages

    Nov 07, 2019 · This category has the following 21 subcategories, out of 21 total. Diminutives of female given names from Italic languages by language ‎ (4 c, 0 e) Diminutives of male given names from Italic languages by language ‎ (10 c, 0 e) Given names from Italic languages by language ‎ (69 c, 0 e) Surnames from Italic languages by language ‎ (24 c ...

  10. Italic languages Wiki - Everipedia › Italic_languages

    The Italic languages are a branch of the Indo-European language family, whose earliest known members were spoken in the Italian peninsula in the first millennium BC. The best-known member is Latin, the only language of the group that survived into the common era. All other Italic languages became extinct by the 1st century BC, when their speakers were assimilated into the Roman Empire and ...

  11. People also search for
  1. Ads
    related to: Italic languages wikipedia