Search results
- After more than nine hours of deliberation, the jury on Wednesday, Nov. 26, found Simon, 35, guilty of three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and one charge of accosting a minor for immoral purposes for her sexual relationship with the Catholic Central High School student.
www.mlive.com › news › grand-rapidsAbigail Simon conviction: Holdout juror explains why she ...
Nov 22, 2022 · GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (WOOD) — A former tutor who was convicted eight years ago of sexually abusing a student was paroled Tuesday. Abigail Simon, 43, had been in a state prison since January 2015.
People also ask
Where is Abigail Simon now?
Did Abigail Simon pose a threat of criminal conduct?
Was Abigail Simon the aggressor or the victim?
Nov 22, 2022 · GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. — A former Grand Rapids Central High School and West Catholic tutor sentenced in 2015 for sexually assaulting a student has been released from prison. Abigail Simon was...
Nov 22, 2022 · Abigail Simon, now 43, was convicted in 2014 of three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct involving a 15-year-old student. She had been serving up to 25 years but was released on the...
Jan 26, 2022 · In 2014, a Michigan jury convicted Abigail Simon of having a sexual relationship with a 15-year-old boy. The Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed her convictions and the Michigan Supreme Court denied review. Simon later petitioned for federal habeas relief, arguing that a jury instruction at her trial violated her due-process rights.
Nov 26, 2014 · Abigail Simon is found guilty of having unforced sex with a 15-year-old boy whom she tutored while employed at Catholic Central High School in 2013.
- 1 min
- 2.4M
- MLive
Nov 26, 2014 · After more than nine hours of deliberation, the jury on Wednesday, Nov. 26, found Simon, 35, guilty of three counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and one charge of accosting a minor for...
Jun 17, 2016 · The Michigan Court of Appeals on Friday upheld Abigail Simon’s January 2015 prison sentence of eight to 25 years. But the panel ruled a lower court judge must determine if the information used in crafting Simon’s sentence was appropriate, citing subsequent Supreme Court decisions.
