Search results
In April 2011, Apple Inc. (Apple) sued Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd. (Samsung) and argued that certain design elements of Samsung’s smartphones infringed on specific patents for design elements in the iPhone that Apple holds. The jury held that Samsung had infringed on Apple’s patents and awarded over $1 billion in damages.
Aug 29, 2012 · The jury found that, in 24 of its phones and tablets, Samsung had infringed on all three utility patents and three of four design patents that Apple had asserted. The jury rejected Samsung’s defense that the patents were invalid.
People also ask
What is Apple v Samsung Electronics?
Does Apple infringe the d'889 patent?
Why did Samsung appeal a jury verdict?
Dec 6, 2016 · As relevant here, a jury found that various smartphones manufactured by petitioners (collectively, Samsung) infringed design patents owned by respondent Apple Inc. that covered a rectangular front face with rounded edges and a grid of colorful icons on a black screen.
Oct 11, 2016 · Argument preview: Justices to consider $400 million verdict for Samsung’s infringement of the design of Apple’s iPhone (Corrected) (Ronald Mann, October 4, 2016)
May 14, 2012 · Justia Opinion Summary. Apple claimed that Samsung smartphones, the Galaxy S and the Infuse, and its Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet infringed four Apple patents. Apple sought a preliminary injunction to block importation and U.S. sales. The district court denied the motion with respect to each device and all asserted patents.
Nov 6, 2017 · Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Apple Inc. - SCOTUSblog. Petition for certiorari denied on November 6, 2017. Issues: (1) Whether the court's decisions in Graham v.
Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the general title of a series of patent infringement lawsuits between Apple Inc. and Samsung Electronics in the United States Court system, regarding the design of smartphones and tablet computers. Between them, the two companies have dominated the manufacturing of smartphones since the early 2010s ...
