Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Miranda v. Arizona: Under the Fifth Amendment, any statements that a defendant in custody makes during an interrogation are admissible as evidence at a criminal trial only if law enforcement told the defendant of the right to remain silent and the right to speak with an attorney before the interrogation started, and the rights were either ...

  2. On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested in his house and brought to the police station where he was questioned by police officers in connection with a kidnapping and rape. After two hours of interrogation, the police obtained a written confession from Miranda.

  3. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Supreme Court of the United States. Ernesto A. Miranda v. State of Arizona. Decided June 13, 1966 – 384 U.S. 436. Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court. The cases before us raise questions which go to the roots of our concepts of American criminal jurisprudence: the restraints society must ...

  4. No. 759. Miranda v. Arizona. On March 13, 1963, petitioner, Ernesto Miranda, was arrested at his home and taken in custody to a Phoenix police station. He was there identified by the...

  5. In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.

  6. Jan 19, 2022 · This guide discusses the seminal U.S. Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona, featuring a chronology of key events and original documents from Supreme Court Justices.

  7. People also ask

  8. MIRANDA v. ARIZONA. CERTIORARI TO THE SU-fREME COURT OF ARIZONA. . ' ·No. 759. Argued February 28-March 1, 1966.-, Decided June 13, 1966.* · In each of these cases the defendant while in police custody was questioned by police officers, detectives, or'a prosecuting attorney

  1. People also search for