Search results
APA citation style: Warren, E. & Supreme Court Of The United States. (1965) U.S. Reports: Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436. [Periodical] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/usrep384436/.
The jury found Miranda guilty. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Arizona affirmed and held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated because he did not specifically request counsel.
Citation. Wrightsman, L. S. (2010). The Supreme Court on Miranda rights and interrogations: The past, the present, and the future. In G. D. Lassiter & C. A. Meissner (Eds.), Police interrogations and false confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations (pp. 161–177).
- Lawrence S. Wrightsman
- 2010
The Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v. Arizona entitled suspects in custodial interrogation to be informed of their rights to silence and counsel, an eponymous notification now known as the Miranda warnings.
May 17, 2024 · Miranda v. Arizona, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 13, 1966, established a code of conduct for police interrogations of criminal suspects held in custody.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
In its landmark decision in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court of the United States buttressed the Constitutional privilege against self-incrimination by requiring as a procedural safeguard that various aspects of this privilege be clearly communicated to custodial suspects.
Supreme Court Case. Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Miranda warning. National Constitution Center Collection. Justice Vote: 5-1-3. Majority: Warren (author), Black, Douglas, Brennan, Fortas.
