Search results
The United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyers' Edition, or Lawyers' Edition (L. Ed. and L. Ed. 2d in case citations), is an unofficial reporter of Supreme Court of the United States opinions. The Lawyers' Edition was established by the Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company of Rochester, New York in 1882, and features coverage of Supreme ...
- Florida v. J. L.
Full case name. Florida v. J. L. Citations. 529 U.S. 266 (...
- Lane v. Franks
Lane v. Franks , 573 U.S. 228 (2014), is a U.S. Supreme...
- Florida v. J. L.
Product description. L Ed 2d is a complete, enhanced, unofficial reporter of U.S. Supreme Court decisions since 1956, with convenient special research features not found in the official United States Reports. New decisions are initially released through the Advance Sheet Service, with softbound pamphlets including the full text of decisions and ...
- Print Book
Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that plaintiffs must present a "plausible" cause of action. Alongside Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (and together known as Twiqbal ), Iqbal raised the threshold which plaintiffs needed to meet.
- Souter, joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer
- Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito
- John D. Ashcroft, former Attorney General, et al., Petitioners v. Javaid Iqbal, et al.
Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the machine-or-transformation test is not the sole test for determining the patent eligibility of a process, but rather "a useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under § 101."
- Stevens (in judgment), joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
- Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Thomas, Alito; Scalia (except Parts II–B–2 and II–C–2)
- Bernard L. Bilski and Rand A. Warsaw v. David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office
Troxel v. Granville , 530 U.S. 57 (2000), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States , citing a constitutional right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children, struck down a Washington law that allowed any third party to petition state courts for child visitation rights over parental objections.
