Search results
May 18, 2011 · Based on claims of alleged infringement of its trademarks, trade dress, and utility and design patents, Apple seeks an order requiring Samsung to produce certain product samples, marketing materials, documents, and a 30 (b) (6) corporate witness on an expedited basis. The Court heard argument on the matter on May 12, 2011, and ordered limited ...
Aug 29, 2012 · DAY 12: Tuesday 14 August – More Samsung witnesses. Tuesday saw Samsung try and argue that Apple’s patents are invalidated by prior art, and a Samsung employee took the stand to claim that she ...
Apr 4, 2012 · In this patent infringement action, Plaintiff Apple Inc. (" Apple" ) moves to compel Defendants and counter-claimants Samsung Electronics Co., LTD, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively " Samsung" ) to produce six witnesses for depositions. Samsung cross-moves for a protective order to ...
May 18, 2011 · Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al., C 11-1846 & C 12-0630. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Ltd. Inc. Selected Case Documents (C 11-1846) Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Ltd. Inc. Selected Case Documents (C 12-630) In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation; In re: Anthem, Inc. Data Breach Litigation
Oct 9, 2016 · In that case, a jury told Samsung to pay Apple $119.6 million for infringing some of its patents, while Apple owed Samsung $158,400 for infringing one of the Korean company's patents.
Apple and Samsung are very different companies, although they both produce smartphones. He explained that while Apple could be considered an “innovation” company, as its focus was with the design and the user interface, and Samsung could be considered a “manufacture” company. The two companies have different business models.
May 18, 2015 · The jury in the partial retrial on damages awarded Apple $290,456,793, which the district court upheld over Samsung's second post-trial motion. On March 6, 2014, the district court entered a final judgment in favor of Apple, and Samsung filed a notice of appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1295 (a) (1).
