Yahoo Web Search

Search results

    • 558 U.S. 310 (2010

      • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
  1. People also ask

  2. Sep 9, 2009 · Facts of the case. Citizens United sought an injunction against the Federal Election Commission in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to prevent the application of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) to its film Hillary: The Movie. The Movie expressed opinions about whether Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton would ...

  3. Mar 26, 2018 · In Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission (FEC), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that political spending is a form of free speech that’s protected under the First...

  4. FEC (2003) (in part) Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The court held 5–4 that the freedom of speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the ...

    • Stevens, joined by Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
    • Citizens United, Appellant v. Federal Election Commission
    • Roberts, joined by Alito
    • Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Alito; Thomas (all but Part IV); Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor (Part IV)
  5. Dec 12, 2019 · January 21, 2020 will mark a decade since the Supreme Courts ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, a controversial decision that reversed century-old campaign finance restrictions and enabled corporations and other outside groups to spend unlimited funds on elections.

  6. Oct 30, 2020 · U.S. Supreme Court. One of the most controversial modern Supreme Court opinions, Citizens United gave corporations and unions unprecedented power in elections. Find out more about the background of the case, the opinion, the dissents, and the aftermath on FindLaw's Supreme Court Insights.

  7. Jan 20, 2020 · Ten years ago this week, the court decided Citizens United v FEC, a landmark 5-4 ruling that unleashed billions of dollars from corporations, labor unions and other groups into American campaigns as a protected form of free speech.

  8. Sep 9, 2009 · Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Holding: Political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment, and the government may not keep corporations or unions from spending money to support or denounce individual candidates in elections.

  1. People also search for