Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. quizlet.com › 107996571 › escobedo-v-illinois-flashEscobedo v Illinois Flashcards | Quizlet

   quizlet.com › 107996571 › escobedo-v-illinois-flash

   • Cached

   Escobedo v Illinois Flashcards | Quizlet. 5.0 (1 review) Term. 1 / 3. Facts. Click the card to flip 👆. Definition. 1 / 3. After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney.

2. quizlet.com › 553712385 › escobedo-v-illinois-flashEscobedo V. Illinois Flashcards | Quizlet

   quizlet.com › 553712385 › escobedo-v-illinois-flash

   • Cached

   Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Escobedo v. Illinois June 22, 1964, Escobedo v. Illinois June 22, 1964, Escobedo v. Illinois June 22, 1964 and more.

3. People also ask

   What happened in Escobedo v Illinois?

   • Escobedo v. Illinois 378 U.S. 438 (1964), argued 29 Apr. 1964, decided 22 June 1964 by vote of 5 to 4; Goldberg for the Court, Harlan, Stewart, White, and Clark in dissent. When Danny Escobedo, a murder suspect, was taken to the police station and put in an interrogation room, he repeatedly asked to speak to the lawyer he had retained.

   Escobedo v. Illinois - Oxford Reference

   www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095757715

   See all results for this question

   Are Escobedo's statements compelled?

   • Escobedo's statements were not compelled, and the Court does not hold that they were. This new American judges' rule, which is to be applied in both federal and state courts, is perhaps thought to be a necessary safeguard against the possibility of extorted confessions.

   Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964) - Justia US Supreme Court Center

   supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/378/478/

   See all results for this question

   Why did the Supreme Court throw out Escobedo's confession?

   • Even though Escobedo had been interrogated before adversary proceedings had commenced against him (compare *Massiah v. United States, 1964), the Supreme Court threw out his confession. Because of the accordion-like quality of Justice Arthur Goldberg's opinion for the narrow majority, a great deal of confusion resulted.

   Escobedo v. Illinois - Oxford Reference

   www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095757715

   See all results for this question

   What happened in Escobedo v Arizona?

   • Two years later Escobedo was shoved off-stage by the equally controversial case of *Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Miranda shifted from a “prime suspect,” or “focal point,” test to a “custodial interrogation” standard, moving from Escobedo's right-to-counsel rationale to one grounded primarily in the privilege against self-incrimination.

   Escobedo v. Illinois - Oxford Reference

   www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095757715

   See all results for this question

4. quizlet.com › 362629174 › escobedo-v-illinois-flashEscobedo v. Illinois Flashcards | Quizlet

   quizlet.com › 362629174 › escobedo-v-illinois-flash

   • Cached

   Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Grace (sister) was beaten by brother in law, Arrest, Interagation and more.

5. edge.sagepub.com › escobedo-v-illinois-1964Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) | Online Resources

   edge.sagepub.com › escobedo-v-illinois-1964

   • Cached

   Escobedo v. Illinois. 378 U.S. 478. Case Year: 1964. Case Ruling: 5-3, Reversed and Remanded. Opinion Justice: Goldberg. FACTS. At 2:30 A.M. on January 20, 1960, police arrested Danny Escobedo, a twenty-two-year-old of Mexican extraction, for the murder of his brother-in-law.

6. courses.lumenlearning.com › escobedo-v-illinoisEscobedo v. Illinois | Constitutional Law and Rights

   courses.lumenlearning.com › escobedo-v-illinois

   • Cached

   ESCOBEDO v. ILLINOIS. 378 U.S. 478 (1964) MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG delivered the opinion of the Court. The critical question in this case is whether, under the circumstances, the refusal by the police to honor petitioner’s request to consult with his lawyer during the course of an interrogation constitutes a denial of “the Assistance of Counsel ...

7. supreme.justia.com › cases › federalEscobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964) - Justia US Supreme ...

   supreme.justia.com › cases › federal

   • Cached

   Escobedo v. Illinois: As soon as someone is in the custody of law enforcement, he or she has a Sixth Amendment right to speak to an attorney.

8. www.oxfordreference.com › display › 10Escobedo v. Illinois - Oxford Reference

   www.oxfordreference.com › display › 10

   • Cached

   Overview. Escobedo v. Illinois. Quick Reference. 378 U.S. 438 (1964), argued 29 Apr. 1964, decided 22 June 1964 by vote of 5 to 4; Goldberg for the Court, Harlan, Stewart, White, and Clark in dissent.