Search results
Escobedo v. Illinois. June 22, 1964. After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney.
Escobedo v. Illinois. Danny Escobedo was arrested and taken to a police station for questioning. Over several hours, the police refused his repeated requests to see his lawyer. Escobedo's lawyer sought unsuccessfully to consult with his client. Escobedo subsequently confessed to murder.
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Facts, Issue, Result and more.
ESCOBEDO v. ILLINOIS. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 615. Argued April 29, 1964.-Decided June 22, 1964. Petitioner, a 22-year-old of Mexican extraction, was arrested with his sister and taken to police headquarters for interrogation in connection with the fatal shooting, about 11 days before, of his
Explore the key facts and legal principles of the case Escobedo v Illinois. This quiz will help you understand the implications of the right to counsel and the Miranda rights during police interrogations. Perfect for law students and anyone interested in criminal justice.
Get Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977 (1964), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
People also ask
What is the case Escobedo v Illinois about?
What is the difference between Escobedo v Illinois and Miranda v Arizona?
Who convicted Escobedo?
What happened between Escobedo and Di Gerlando?
MLA citation style: Goldberg, Arthur Joseph, and Supreme Court Of The United States. U.S. Reports: Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478. 1963.Periodical.
