Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Escobedo V. Illinois. Escobedo v. Illinois. After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not ...

  2. C- The Factory Act (1833), The Anti-Poor Law Campaign (1837-38), and the radical press

  3. People also ask

  4. Yes. Reverse the petitioner's conviction and remand the case. The Sixth Amendment protects the right to effective assistance of counsel. Here, because the police investigation focused on the accused as a suspect rather than a less specific investigation, refusing to allow an accused to speak with his attorney is a denial of this Sixth Amendment right.

  5. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Miranda V Arizona Decided ?, Escobedo V Illinois Decided ?, Which court decision was decided first ? and more.

  6. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like What year was each of the above-listed Supreme Court cases decided?, Which court decision was decided first?, Why was Escobedo arrested? and more.

  7. Nov 21, 2023 · Danny Escobedo Arrest. On January 19, 1960, at 2:30 a.m., 22-year-old Danny Escobedo, who had no prior criminal record, was arrested in Cook County and taken to police headquarters in Chicago ...

  1. People also search for