Search results
Escobedo v. Illinois. June 22, 1964. Click the card to flip 👆. After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney.
Yes. Reverse the petitioner's conviction and remand the case. The Sixth Amendment protects the right to effective assistance of counsel. Here, because the police investigation focused on the accused as a suspect rather than a less specific investigation, refusing to allow an accused to speak with his attorney is a denial of this Sixth Amendment right.
Escobedo v. Illinois. Danny Escobedo was arrested and taken to a police station for questioning. Over several hours, the police refused his repeated requests to see his lawyer. Escobedo's lawyer sought unsuccessfully to consult with his client. Escobedo subsequently confessed to murder.
Learn escobedo+v.+illinois with free interactive flashcards. Choose from 334 different sets of escobedo+v.+illinois flashcards on Quizlet.
chapter 9 : wrongful conviction. Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) Click the card to flip 👆. Ruled that a defendant must be allowed access to a lawyer before questioning by police. Click the card to flip 👆. 1 / 8.
Case opinion for US Supreme Court ESCOBEDO v. ILLINOIS. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Quizlet has study tools to help you learn anything. Improve your grades and reach your goals with flashcards, practice tests and expert-written solutions today.
