Search results
Apr 15, 2011 at 8:04. 4. The reason for not using CC licenses for software is that (1) they aren't generally compatible with the GPL, which makes using CC-licensed free software a little tricky and (2) they don't require sharing of source code on distribution, which is especially problematic for "share-alike" licenses .
Apr 26, 2023 · For example, Beerware is a term used to describe a software license based on the "beer-buying" tradition in some cultures. This means if you ever meet in person, you need to buy the owner of the component a beer. Oftentimes these licenses, like the WTFPL, aim to poke fun at other copyleft or permissive licenses. Closed source licenses Commercial
- What Is Open Source?
- What Is A License and Why Would I Need One?
- What Options Are there?
- "Copyleft" Licenses: Gpl, AGPL, LGPL
- Permissive Licenses: MIT, Bsd, Apache, ...
- Creative Commons
- Public Domain, Cc0, Unlicense, ...
- So How Do I License My Open Source Project?
- Tl;Dr
- Further Reading
Many people think that Open Source simply means availability of the source code of a project, but that does only tell part of the whole story. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) provides a commonly accepted definitionof what constitutes Open Source. To summarize that, in order to be constituted Open Source, 1. a work has to allow free redistribution,...
Any work that you create by default makes you the copyright holder of it. That means only you are allowed to distribute whatever you created. If you want to transfer this right to other people as well, you can do that via a so-called license. Consider it a set of rules that define how others may use, distribute, modify and otherwise interact with t...
Thankfully you do not have to write your own license (and frankly, neither should you, there be dragons). There are a multitude of existing licenses for you to choose from already, and I'm going to introduce you to some of the most common ones. Please note that I'm going to focus on Open Source software licenses here, so licenses that fulfill the O...
Remember when I said that you could require anyone who modifies your work to share its source as well? Having to adhere to similar terms is commonly referred to as being viral and the most popular member of the family of viral Open Source licenses are the so called copyleft(in contrast to "copyright") licenses GPL, AGPL and LGPL. The GPL, or GNU Pu...
If the copyleft philosophy isn't your thing for any reason, there is a family of quite permissive Open Source Licenses that are not viral but still offer attribution and protection against liability. The MIT, BSD and Apache licenses are all pretty similar. All of them require that attribution must be kept in place, warranty & liability are strictly...
If you are into hardware development, you might have come across the family of Creative Commons licenses. Creative Commons is a bit like a choose-your-own-adventure of licensing - you have a base license which rules out warranty, and various modules that you can attach to it as well if you want: 1. BY: requires the author to be stated 2. SA: any de...
It might happen that you also come across software that has been released into the Public Domain, meaning that all copyright claims have been forfeit. This concept seems to be quite attractive to people who really just want to set their code free and don't care at all what happens to it. It should be noted that even though this might seem a quite c...
Depending on whether your project is stand-alone or building on the work of others, there are different things to consider. If you are creating a standalone project, you can freely decide on a license. Take a look at other projects in your development community, or similar projects, and what they have chosen. Make sure you understand the license yo...
Unless you put a license on your source code, your exclusive copyright applies and no one can really utilize your code. There is a huge number of available licenses to choose from, and before you decide on one you should make sure you understand it, are comfortable with it and also don't run into any kinds of incompatibilities with things you depen...
People also ask
What are the different types of open source licenses?
Are open-source licenses free?
Should I combine open source software under different licenses?
What do you need to know about open-source licensing?
Dec 15, 2023 · Open source licenses set the terms under which the software can be used, modified and redistributed. This serves multiple purposes: Allows commercial use of open source software. Protects open source code from proprietary forks. Requires user improvements to be open sourced. Credits the original creators.
A permissive open source license is a non-copyleft open source license that guarantees the freedom to use, modify, and redistribute, while also permitting proprietary derivative works. Permissive open source licenses, lovingly referred to as “Anything Goes,” place minimal restrictions on how others can use open source components.
A license, whether providing open-source code or not, that does not stipulate the "four software freedoms", [3] are not considered "free" by the free software movement. A closed source license is one that limits only the availability of the source code. By contrast a copyleft license claims to protect the "four software freedoms" by explicitly ...
Nov 16, 2022 · You can license repo #3 under a permissive open-source license, like MIT or Apache. Permissive open-source licenses do not place a restriction on the type of license that is used by the dependencies. You might get some flack from people for the fact that repo #3 depends on closed-source code, but that is only sentiment speaking.
