Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 13,700 search results
  1. Gideon v. Wainwright was one of a series of Supreme Court decisions that confirmed the right of defendants in criminal proceedings, upon request, to have counsel appointed both during the trial and on appeal. In the subsequent cases Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964), and Miranda v.

  2. Supreme Court of Florida. May 15, 1963. Clarence Earl Gideon, in pro. per. Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Bruce Jacob, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent. THORNAL, Justice. Following our denial of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus this cause was considered by the Supreme Court of the United States on a writ of certiorari.

  3. Case name: Clarence E. Gideon v. Louie L. Wainwright, Corrections Director Year decided: 1963 Result: 9-0, in favor of Gideon Related constitutional issue/amendment: Sixth Amendment (right to...

  4. People also ask

    What was the decision in Gideon v Wainwright?

    Was Gideon v Wainwright civil rights or civil liberties case?

    Which amendment was violated in the Gideons v Wainwright case?

    What does the case Gideon v. Wainwright guarantee?

  5. Supreme Court Case Project. ... GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT. Year: 1963 Result: 9:0, favor Gideon Related Constitutional issue/amendment: 6th amendment ...

  6. The Essay on Gideon V Wainwright Supreme Court 2... misdemeanor. Appearing in court without funds and without a lawyer, Gideon asked the Florida state court to appoint counsel for him, whereupon ... case, regardless of circumstances, an indigent accused must be furnished counsel by the state. Gideon recieved a new trial with a ...

  7. Check out the New York appellate court’s ruling in the Summer Zervos lawsuit. If you have the stomach for it, read Clarence Thomas’s dissent in the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Garza v. Idaho. In the question-and-answer section, we discussed this statute, Rooney’s arrest record, and Cohen v. California.

  1. People also search for