Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 487,000 search results
  1. Gregg v. Georgia, Proffitt v. Florida, Jurek v. Texas, Woodson v. North Carolina, and Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 153, reaffirmed the United States Supreme Court's acceptance of the use of the death penalty in the United States, upholding, in particular, the death sentence imposed on Troy Leon Gregg. Referred to by a leading scholar as the July 2 Cases and elsewhere referred to by the lead case Gregg, the Supreme Court set forth the two main features that capital sentencing procedures must em

    • Burger, joined by Rehnquist
    • Stewart, Powell, Stevens
  2. Mar 27, 2017 · Georgia, United States Supreme Court, (1976) Case summary for Gregg v. Georgia: Gregg was convicted of murder and sentenced to the death penalty under a Georgia state statute. Gregg claimed the sentence violated the Eighth and 14th Amendment of the Constitution. The state Supreme Court affirmed the sentence for the murder conviction and Gregg appealed.

    • Summary
    • Background
    • Procedural History
    • Issues
    • Arguments by Petitioner
    • Arguments by Respondent
    • Decision
    • Majority Opinion
    • Concurring Opinion
    • Dissenting Opinion

    Gregg v. Georgia, 428 US 153 (1976) was the Supreme Court case which established that the death penalty, as long as it is applied appropriately, is constitutional and does not violate the 8th and 14thamendment. Troy Gregg, after being convicted in the lower Georgia Courts and sentenced to death, appealed his case to the Supreme Court. Troy Gregg di...

    One of the most significant aspects ofGregg v. Georgia was the basis of Troy Gregg’s appeal to the Supreme Court. His appeal stood on the claim that the death penalty was in actuality a from of cruel and unusual punishment as a sentence for the crimes he had committed. This claim was based on Furman v. Georgia, in which the court ruled that capital...

    Troy Leon Gregg is arrested 1973, and his case will be the first case to be decided underneath Georgia’s new bifurcated system.
    Gregg is convicted by the lower courts of Georgia in 1973 on all charges (Murder/Armed Robbery), and is sentenced to death using the first set of procedural guidelines of the bifurcated system
    The case decision is sent to the Georgia Supreme Court for appellate review as the second step of the bifurcated process.
    The Georgia Supreme Court justices review the lower courts decision and affirm Gregg’s death penalty as it relates to the murders not the robberies
    Does Georgia’s new bifurcated system still violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment because it is still creates an inconsistency in applying the death penalty?
    Is the imposition of the death sentence prohibited under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments as “cruel and unusual” punishment per se?

    Troy Leon Gregg would argue that despite Georgia’s development of a bifurcated death penalty system, Georgia’s application of the death penalty is still inconsistently and arbitrarily decided. Not only that, Gregg would further argue that his capital punishment is the violation of his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights that protect against subj...

    Georgia would counter Troy Leon Gregg’s claim and argue that their new bifurcated system creates a “checks and balances” method that allow for the impartial sentencing of the death penalty. The bifurcated process gives the accused to a two-part review system. First, the case is heard and decided by the lower courts where a jury will make the decisi...

    Is the death penalty in Georgia considered unconstitutional due to a violation of the eighth and fourteenth amendments as cruel and unusual punishment? (No) In a 7-2 decision, the court ruled that the death penalty could be upheld and impartially justified in states that decided to enforce it.

    Joined by Justices Powell and Stevens, Justice Stewart’s majority opinion declares that the “the punishment of death for the crime of murder does not, under all circumstances, violate the eighth and fourteenth amendments”. He states that “in the 4 years since Furman v. Georgia, at least 35 states have enacted new statutes providing for the death pe...

    Justice White’s concurring opinion, which was supported in concurrence by Justices Burger, Rehnquist, and Blackmun, simply reiterated the defense of the Georgia statute by which Gregg v. Georgiawas upheld. This concurring opinion also pointed out the lack of merit in the Gregg’s appeal, specifically stating the appellant’s claim that “the prosecuto...

    Justice Brennan presents the question of morality in his dissenting opinion by stating that “the country has debated whether a society for which the dignity of the individual is the supreme value can, without a fundamental inconsistency, follow the practice of deliberately putting some of its members to death”. Brennan also claims that the advancem...

  3. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976) Gregg v. Georgia. No. 74-6257. Argued March 31, 1976. Decided July 2, 1976. 428 U.S. 153. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA Syllabus. Petitioner was charged with committing armed robbery and murder on the basis of evidence that he had killed and robbed two men.

  4. Greg v Georgia is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which it was held that death penalty for murder was not in and of itself a cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. It was held that the Eighth Amendment has to be interpreted in a dynamic and flexible manner to conform with evolving standards of decency.

  5. The Gregg v. Georgia case is historically and legally significant because it upheld the legality of the death penalty. Gregg v. Georgia was one of the first cases to challenge the court's decision...

  1. People also search for