Yahoo Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: guess who's coming to dinner reviews
  2. Browse & discover thousands of brands. Read customer reviews & find best sellers. Find deals on guess who's coming on Amazon

Search results

  1. Guess Who's Coming to Dinner

    Guess Who's Coming to Dinner

    1967 · Comedy drama · 1h 48m
  1. All of these deep profundities aside, however, let me say that "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" is a magnificent piece of entertainment. It will make you laugh and may even make you cry. When old, gray-haired, weather-beaten Spencer Tracy turns to Katharine Hepburn and declares, by God, that he DOES remember what it is like to be in love, there ...

  2. Monsignor Mike Ryan. When Joanna Drayton (Katharine Houghton), a free-thinking white woman, and black doctor John Prentice (Sidney Poitier) become engaged, they travel to San Francisco to meet her ...

    • (38)
    • Spencer Tracy
    • Stanley Kramer
    • Columbia Pictures Corporation
  3. An innately compelling experience. Full Review | Original Score: 5/5 | Jan 14, 2022. Stanley Kramer's Guess Who's Coming to Dinner features a masterclass in acting from Spencer Tracy, Sidney ...

  4. Solution: make it a drama with comedy. “Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner” is an outstanding Stanley Kramer production, superior in almost every imaginable way, which examines its subject matter ...

  5. Her character's motivations and attitudes are justified, though. Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner is an essential classic 1960s film, and one of the best films that examine prejudice and racism; it tackles its weighty themes with surprising depth, humor and breeziness. It's also very relevant nowadays. And there is no doubt that it has major ...

    • Stanley Kramer
    • Kelly Kessler
    • Sony Pictures
  6. Jun 23, 2020 · It’s an important question that remains an integral part of the dialogue today, and one that keeps the film relevant in the modern era. VERDICT: 5 out of 5 stars. Despite its shortcomings, Guess ...

  7. Guess Who's Coming to Dinner - well, when I first saw it in its initial release, I remember being confused by its purpose. What on paper was worthy and timely, I suppose it was, played as pathetic pandering - poor Mr. Poitier, underplaying with his usual skill, finesse and emotional rootedness, against several other 2-dimensional characters.

  1. People also search for