Yahoo Web Search

  1. About 7,950,000 search results
  1. The Shailendra dynasty (IAST: Śailēndra, Indonesian pronunciation: [ʃaɪlenˈdraː] derived from Sanskrit combined words Śaila and Indra, meaning "King of the Mountain", also spelled Sailendra, Syailendra or Selendra) was the name of a notable Indianised dynasty that emerged in 8th-century Java, whose reign signified a cultural renaissance in the region.

    Date
    King's Or Ruler's Name
    Capital
    Stone Inscription And Source Of ...
    c. 650
    Santanu
    ?
    Sojomerto inscription (c. 670–700)
    c. 674
    Dapunta Selendra
    Batang (Central Java north coast)
    Sojomerto inscription (c. 670–700)
    674—703
    Kalingga, somewhere between Pekalongan ...
    Carita Parahyangan, Chinese account on ...
    703—710
    Mandiminyak (?)
    ?
    • Kalinga
    • Earlier Comments
    • "External Links Are Not Sources"
    • Sailendra, King? Prince? Or A Buddhist Refuge?
    • WikiProject Class Rating
    • Updated
    • Shailendra vs. Sailendra
    • External Links Modified

    I edited writing Kalinga was an eastern kingdom of India which is presently Odisha.And Odisha is considered as eastern state in India not an south eastern state.User:diptiprakashpalai —Preceding undatedcomment added 17:41, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

    There is no really evidence, that 2 different kingdoms had existed on java at this time. sanjaya is just the name of a king and maybe the ancestor sailendras. later were Singhasari and Majapahit - nothing is written, that they had ruled on java meanwhile. --Lofor20:05, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1. So far as I can see, neither of the two external links from this page have information about Saliendra 87.194.56.18719:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)Willow4 1. Sanjaya dynasty was founded by King Sanjaya, it's pretty obvious that the article about Sailendra refers to Sanjaya the dynasty, so I don't get your point, Lofor. I don't get why you raise the issue about Singhasari and Majapahit either. Both of these kingdoms were established much later. You should brush up your knowledge. 203.82.80.27 (talk)

    Yes they are. Paul Beardsell10:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC) 1. Did you check them? If you look at the history you will see that the external links were added after the article was written. Either way, the article is badly referenced. Can you dispute that? --Merbabu12:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC) No I did not check them. If you look at the history you will see that the external link was there when I removed the template that said there wasn't one. And, yes, I agree, the article needs improvement. But what point are you trying to make? Paul Beardsell15:49, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

    It is stated in the text "At its peak the Sailendra kingdom ruled the eastern two-thirds of Java, Bali, Lombok, coastal areas of Kalimantan, southern Sulawesi, and the Funanese successor state of Water Chenla." I doubt that Sailendra ever gained power in central Java. I just read this: W. J. van der Meulen (1979). "King Sañjaya and His Successors". Indonesia. 28: 17–54., and at page 41 here what it says: We need to rewrite this article based on reliable sources. — Indon (reply) — 11:19, 5 October 2007 (UTC) 1. The Sail.article can be improved at several points. Regarding controversial points, it's good not to rely on pers. suggestions of particular historians but concentrate on evidence. 1. concentrating on the claimed territories, for now ; The Kalimantan, Bali , Sulawesi , Chenla etc part can surely be deleted. No historical evidence for this (atleast not during the Javanese period of the 800s).There is evidence that Chenla was under suzerainity of Java for some time,but we dont k...

    This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot17:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

    The unsourced info is removed ( also the talk about Deva raja and ricefields) Its shorter now but many in text-citations are added ; the content is backed up by studies and its the most common version . A. Post-Muller (talk) 21:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

    Hi, the article was previously using the IAST spelling of Śailēndra which IMO, is confusing. Ś is romanised further to Sh which is also used by reliable sources instead of Śailēndra. Thanks. --Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying)16:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC) 1. Yes the Shailendra is also correct and used in Brittanica. Yet, the common spelling of this dynasty in most of english language sources (books, journals, news etc.) is Sailendra without any "h" or written in "Ś". In Indonesian we even have also equally valid spelling as Syailendra, yet I think we should stick to common most simple spelling instead of favouring certain Indian/Sri Lankan/or certain Indonesian versions/spellings (Sh or Sy). Plus, I think it is weird to have Sailendra dynasty article, but having the Shailendra spelling all throughout the article.Gunkarta talk 18:18, 11 September 2015 (UTC) 1.1. Other user already moved the page from Sailendra to Shailendra. And after careful thought, I think the spel...

    Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just added archive links to one external link on Shailendra dynasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes: 1. Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131101014301/http://nsc.iseas.edu.sg/documents/working_papers/nscwps012.pdf to http://nsc.iseas.edu.sg/documents/working_papers/nscwps012.pdf When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueto let others know. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "Ext...

  2. People also ask

    Who were the Sailendras and what did they do?

    What does shilawendra stand for?

    Was the Shailendra dynasty a Javanese dynasty?

    Who was the last king of Shailendra dynasty?

  3. The Sailendra Dynasty ( IAST: Śailēndra, derived from the combination of the Sanskrit words Śaila and Indra, which mean “King of the Mountain”; also spelled Shailendra, Syailendra, Selendra, Çailendra and Sjailendra) was an important Indonesian dynasty that emerged in the 8th century in Java, whose reign marked a cultural renaissance in the region.

    • Asal Usul
    • Era Kerajaan Medang
    • Runtuhnya Wangsa Sailendra
    • Daftar Raja-Raja
    • Lihat Pula
    • Daftar Pustaka

    Di Indonesia nama Śailendravamsa dijumpai pertama kali di dalam prasasti Kalasan dari tahun 778 Masehi (Śailendragurubhis; Śailendrawańśatilakasya; Śailendrarajagurubhis). Kemudian nama itu ditemukan di dalam prasasti Kelurak dari tahun 782 Masehi (Śailendrawańśatilakena), dalam prasasti Abhayagiriwihara dari tahun 792 Masehi (dharmmatuńgadewasyaśailendra), prasasti Sojomerto dari sekitar tahun 700 Masehi (selendranamah) dan prasasti Kayumwuńan dari tahun 824 Masehi (śailendrawańśatilaka). Di luar Indonesia nama ini ditemukan dalam prasasti Ligor dari tahun 775 Masehi dan prasasti Nalanda. Mengenai asal usul keluarga Śailendra banyak dipersoalkan oleh beberapa sarjana. Berbagai pendapat telah dikemukakan oleh sejarawan dan arkeologis dari berbagai negara. Ada yang mengatakan bahawa keluarga Jawa Śailendra berasal dari Sumatra, dari India, dan dari Funan.

    Selama ini kerajaan Medang dianggap diperintah oleh dua wangsa yaitu Wangsa Sailendra yang beragama Buddha dan Wangsa Sanjaya yang beragama Hindu Siwa, pendapat ini pertama kali diperkenalkan oleh Bosch. Pada awal era Medang atau Mataram Kuno, wangsa Sailendra cukup dominan di Jawa Tengah. Menurut para ahli sejarah, wangsa Sanjaya awalnya berada di bawah pengaruh kekuasaan wangsa Sailendra. Mengenai persaingan kekuasaan tersebut tidak diketahui secara pasti, akan tetapi kedua-duanya sama-sama berkuasa di Jawa Tengah. Sementara Poerbatjaraka menolak anggapan Bosch mengenai adanya dua wangsa kembar berbeda agama yang saling bersaing ini. Menurutnya hanya ada satu wangsa dan satu kerajaan, yaitu wangsa Sailendra dan Kerajaan Medang. Sanjaya dan keturunannya adalah anggota Sailendra juga. Ditambah menurut Boechari, melalui penafsirannya atas Prasasti Sojomertobahwa wangsa Sailendra pada mulanya memuja Siwa, sebelum Panangkaran beralih keyakinan menjadi penganut Buddha Mahayana. Raja-raj...

    Berapa sejarawan berusaha menjelaskan berakhirnya kekuasaan Sailendra di Jawa Tengah mengaitkannya dengan kepindahan Balaputradewa ke Sriwijaya (Sumatra). Selama ini sejarawan seperti Dr. Bosch dan Munoz menganut paham adanya dua wangsa kembar berbeda keyakinan yang saling bersaing; Sanjaya-Sailendra. Mereka beranggapan Sailendra yang penganut Buddha kalah bersaing dan terusir oleh wangsa Sanjaya yang Hindu aliran Siwa. Dimulai dengan adanya ketimpangan perekonomian serta perbedaan keyakinan antara Sailendra sang penguasa yang beragama Buddha dengan rakyat Jawa yang kebanyakan beragama Hindu Siwa, menjadi faktor terjadinya ketidakstabilan di Jawa Tengah.[butuh rujukan] Untuk memantapkan posisinya di Jawa Tengah, raja Samaratungga menikahkan putrinya Pramodhawardhani, dengan anak Garung, Rakai Pikatan yang waktu itu menjadi pangeran wangsa Sanjaya. Sejak itu pengaruh Sanjaya yang bercorak Hindu mulai dominan di Mataram, menggantikan agama Buddha. Rakai Pikatan bahkan menyerang Balapu...

    Beberapa sejarawan mencoba merekonstruksi kembali urutan daftar silsilah raja-raja Sailendra; meskipun satu sama lain mungkin tidak sepakat. Misalnya, Slamet Muljana, meneruskan teori dinasti kembar Bosch, berpendapat bahwa anggota wangsa Sailendra pertama yang berhasil menjadi raja adalah Rakai Panangkaran. Sementara itu, Poerbatjaraka berpendapat bahwa wangsa Sanjaya itu tidak pernah ada. Dengan kata lain, Wangsa Sanjaya juga merupakan anggota Wangsa Sailendra. Boechari mencoba menyusun tahap awal perkembangan wangsa Sailendra berdasarkan penafsiran atas Prasasti Sojomerto. Sementara Poerbatjaraka mencoba menyusun daftar raja penguasa Sailendra pada periode menengah dan lanjut berdasarkan hubungannya dengan tokoh Sanjaya, beberapa prasasti Sailendra, serta penafsiran atas naskah Carita Parahyangan. Akan tetapi banyak kebingungan yang muncul, karena tampaknya Sailendra berkuasa atas banyak kerajaan; Kalingga, Medang, dan Sriwijaya. Akibatnya nama beberapa raja tampak tumpang tindih...

    George Coedes. 1934. On the origins of the Sailendras of Indonesia. Journal of the Greater India Society I: 61–70.
    K.A.N. Sastri. 1949. History of Sri Vijaya.University of Madras.
    Marwati Djoened Poesponegoro. Nugroho Notosusanto. 1992. Sejarah Nasional Indonesia: Jaman Kuno. Jakarta: PT Balai Pustaka (Persero). ISBN 979-407-408-X
    Paul Michel Munoz. 2006. Early Kingdoms of the Indonesian Archipelago and the Malay Peninsula. Singapura: Editions Didier Millet, ISBN 981-4155-67-5.
  4. The Shailendra dynasty ( IAST: Śailēndra derived from Sanskrit combined words Śaila and Indra, meaning "King of the Mountain", also spelled Sailendra, Syailendra or Selendra) was the name of a notable Indianised dynasty that emerged in 8th-century Java, whose reign signified a cultural renaissance in the region. Shailendra dynasty - Wikipedia.

  5. Sailendra. (sīlĕn`drä), name of a dynasty in Indonesia and SE Asia. The dynasty appeared in central Java in the 7th cent. and had consolidated its position by the mid-8th cent. The Sailendras, who adopted Buddhism, extended their power over the Sumatran domains of Sri Vijaya and the Malay Peninsula and exerted influence in Siam and Indochina.

  1. People also search for