Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Here we define some notation that we will use subse-quently to present the various responsiveness statistics. We assume research participants are assessed at two timepoints and let X. 1. and X. 2. denote their responses on the measure at the first and second assessments respectively. We let D. x. 5 X. 2. 2 X. 1. represent the change in the ...

  2. Abstract. A review of the literature suggests there are two major aspects of responsiveness. We define the first as "internal responsiveness," which characterizes the ability of a measure to change over a prespecified time frame, and the second as "external responsiveness, " which reflects the extent to which change in a measure relates to ...

    • Janice A. Husted, Richard J. Cook, Vern T. Farewell, Dafna D. Gladman
    • 2000
  3. Responsiveness in primary care has been defined as synonymous with patient participation, engagement and involvement. 81 NAPP suggest that being responsive requires practices to engage with patients; that patient experience is a key part of a responsive practice; and that improved communication and responsiveness are needed for a successful ...

    • Carolyn Tarrant, Emma Angell, Richard Baker, Mary Boulton, George Freeman, Patricia Wilkie, Peter Ja...
    • 2014/11
    • 2014
  4. Jun 1, 2000 · The properties and interpretation of commonly used internal and external responsiveness statistics are examined. It is from the interpretation point of view that external responsiveness statistics ...

  5. A review of the literature suggests there are two major aspects of responsiveness. We define the first as “internal responsiveness,” which characterizes the ability of a measure to change over a prespecified time frame, and the second as “external responsiveness,” which reflects the extent to which change in a measure relates to corresponding change in a reference measure of clinical ...

  6. Apr 5, 2019 · Fig. 4.1 Three situations whereby reliability and validity measurement properties are shown. If the truth is represented by the middle of the target (), and the stars represent the measurement to be tested, scenario shows a measurement that is reliable, but not valid; scenario shows a measurement that is not valid and not reliable; and scenario shows a measurement that is valid and reliable.

  7. People also ask

  8. Discussion. The COSMIN group defined responsiveness as “the ability of an instrument to detect change over time in the construct to be measured.”. According to this definition, responsiveness is an aspect of validity. However, other authors use different definitions and subsequently, different methods.

  1. People also search for