Yahoo Web Search

  1. For Your Eyes Only

    For Your Eyes Only

    PG1981 · Action · 2h 7m

Search results

  1. The rest is predictable. In a movie of respectable craftsmanship and moderate pleasures, there's one obvious disappointment. The relationship between Roger Moore and Carole Bouquet is never worked out in an interesting way. Since the days when he was played by Sean Connery, agent 007 has always had a dry, quiet, humorous way with women.

  2. For Your Eyes Only is undeniably easy on the eyes. Maybe too easy to prevent the mind from wandering and the lids from drooping. Oct 30, 2015 Full Review Carson Timar ...

    • (1.8K)
    • John Glen
    • PG
    • Roger Moore
  3. For Your Eyes Only is the twelfth Bond picture, the fifth with Roger Moore in the title role, and no series has been more homogenous. Full Review | Nov 3, 2021.

  4. People also ask

  5. FOR YOUR EYES ONLY is a 1981 action and adventure film involving James Bond played by Roger Moore... There are a few good scenes such as ••• Roger Moore and Q (Desmond Llewellyn) identifying a villain on screen using Moore's description and Q messes up and Roger Moore says "His nose is not a banana, Q!" before eventually getting a match ...

    • (12)
    • John Glen
    • PG
  6. Filter by Rating: 8/10. The Chinese have a saying; "Before setting off on revenge, you first dig two graves"! hitchcockthelegend 14 June 2012. For Your Eyes Only is directed by John Glen and adapted to screenplay by Richard Maibaum and Michael G. Wilson from source stories by Ian Fleming. It stars Roger Moore, Carole Bouquet, Julian Glover ...

  7. A movie review by James Berardinelli. With For Your Eyes Only, Roger Moore's fifth appearance as Bond and the twelfth entry in the long-running series, 007 enters the 1980s with a return to the "glory days" of the '60s. Realizing it would be tough to top the technical glitz of Moonraker, the film makers wisely chose not to try, opting instead ...

  8. It's actually just... solid. For Your Eyes Only is the Roger Moore film that could have been a solid, stand alone movie, removed from the 007 franchise, that still stood up on it's own. It's a bit darker than the others, it's a b... read the rest.

  1. People also search for