Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Nov 21, 2007 · 1. Deontology’s Foil: Consequentialism. Because deontological theories are best understood in contrast to consequentialist ones, a brief look at consequentialism and a survey of the problems with it that motivate its deontological opponents, provides a helpful prelude to taking up deontological theories themselves.

  2. But meta-ethical relativism is not quite fully-fledged moral relativism; for one could consistently affirm it and still insist that one particular standpoint was demonstrably superior to all others. It is the denial of this possibility that gives moral relativism a more radical edge and is responsible for much of the criticism it attracts.

  3. Sep 29, 2023 · Cultural Relativism is the claim that ethical practices differ among cultures, and what is considered right in one culture may be considered wrong in another. The implication of cultural relativism is that no one society is superior to another; they are merely different.

  4. Abstract. Discusses three forms of moral relativism—normative moral relativism, moral judgement relativism, and metaethical relativism. After discussing objections to each view, it is shown that the objections can all be met and that all three versions of moral relativism are correct.

  5. Meta-ethical relativism seems to eliminate the normative relativist's ability to make prescriptive claims. In other words, normative relativism may find it difficult to make a statement like "we think it is moral to tolerate behaviour" without always adding "other people think intolerance of certain behaviours is moral". [ 9 ]

  6. Reviewed by Roann Barris, Professor, art history and ethics, Radford University on 1/13/20 Comprehensiveness rating: 3 see less. it covers the major theories of ethical reasoning but does not discuss some variants of the major theories and relies on definitions and examples which are often either chosen for their simplicity, ordinariness or laughable quality -- I found it hard to take them ...

  7. Meta-ethics is the area of philosophy which attempts to answer the question of what goodness actually is, including whether it even exists. Normative ethical theories attempt to devise a system for determining which actions are good and which are bad, e.g., Utilitarianism, Kantian deontology and Virtue ethics.