Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. quizlet.com › 135188624 › escobedo-v-illinois-flashEscobedo V. Illinois Flashcards | Quizlet

   quizlet.com › 135188624 › escobedo-v-illinois-flash

   • Cached

   Escobedo v. Illinois. After being arrested and taken into police custody as a suspect in the murder of his brother-in-law, the petitioner asked to speak to his attorney. His attorney arrived at police headquarters soon after the petitioner did and was not allowed to speak to his client as the officers said they had not completed questioning.

2. quizlet.com › 893544259 › escobedo-v-illinois-flashescobedo v illinois Flashcards | Quizlet

   quizlet.com › 893544259 › escobedo-v-illinois-flash

   • Cached

   The Court therefore reversed Escobedo's judgment and remanded for further proceedings. Justice Harlan dissented, opining that the judgment of the Supreme Court of Illinois should be affirmed because the majority's conclusion would unjustifiably fetter legitimate methods of criminal law enforcement.

3. quizlet.com › 207664458 › escobedo-vs-illinois-flashEscobedo vs. Illinois Flashcards | Quizlet

   quizlet.com › 207664458 › escobedo-vs-illinois-flash

   • Cached

   Start studying Escobedo vs. Illinois. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Scheduled maintenance: Saturday, June 11 from 1PM to 2PM PDT

4. supreme.justia.com › cases › federalEscobedo v. Illinois :: 378 U.S. 478 (1964) :: Justia US ...

   supreme.justia.com › cases › federal

   • Cached

   Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964) Escobedo v. Illinois No. 615 Argued April 29, 1964 Decided June 22, 1964 378 U.S. 478 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS Syllabus Petitioner, a 22-year-old of Mexican extraction, was arrested with his sister and taken to police headquarters for interrogation in connection with the fatal shooting, about 11 ...

5. courses.lumenlearning.com › escobedo-v-illinoisEscobedo v. Illinois | Constitutional Law and Rights

   courses.lumenlearning.com › escobedo-v-illinois

   • Cached

   ESCOBEDO v. ILLINOIS. 378 U.S. 478 (1964) MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG delivered the opinion of the Court. The critical question in this case is whether, under the circumstances, the refusal by the police to honor petitioner’s request to consult with his lawyer during the course of an interrogation constitutes a denial of “the Assistance of Counsel ...

6. en.wikisource.org › wiki › Escobedo_vEscobedo v. Illinois - Wikisource, the free online library

   en.wikisource.org › wiki › Escobedo_v

   • Cached

   Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that criminal suspects have a right to counsel during police interrogations under the Sixth Amendment. The case was decided a year after the court held in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) that indigent criminal defendants had a right to be ...

7. People also ask

   What happened in Escobedo v Illinois?

   • Escobedo v. Illinois 378 U.S. 438 (1964), argued 29 Apr. 1964, decided 22 June 1964 by vote of 5 to 4; Goldberg for the Court, Harlan, Stewart, White, and Clark in dissent. When Danny Escobedo, a murder suspect, was taken to the police station and put in an interrogation room, he repeatedly asked to speak to the lawyer he had retained.

   Escobedo v. Illinois - Oxford Reference

   www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095757715

   See all results for this question

   What happened in Escobedo v Arizona?

   • Two years later Escobedo was shoved off-stage by the equally controversial case of *Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Miranda shifted from a “prime suspect,” or “focal point,” test to a “custodial interrogation” standard, moving from Escobedo's right-to-counsel rationale to one grounded primarily in the privilege against self-incrimination.

   Escobedo v. Illinois - Oxford Reference

   www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095757715

   See all results for this question

   Why did the Supreme Court throw out Escobedo's confession?

   • Even though Escobedo had been interrogated before adversary proceedings had commenced against him (compare *Massiah v. United States, 1964), the Supreme Court threw out his confession. Because of the accordion-like quality of Justice Arthur Goldberg's opinion for the narrow majority, a great deal of confusion resulted.

   Escobedo v. Illinois - Oxford Reference

   www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095757715

   See all results for this question

   Are Escobedo's statements compelled?

   • Escobedo's statements were not compelled, and the Court does not hold that they were. This new American judges' rule, which is to be applied in both federal and state courts, is perhaps thought to be a necessary safeguard against the possibility of extorted confessions.

   Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964) - Justia US Supreme Court Center

   supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/378/478/

   See all results for this question

8. www.oxfordreference.com › display › 10Escobedo v. Illinois - Oxford Reference

   www.oxfordreference.com › display › 10

   • Cached

   Illinois' in Oxford Reference ». 378 U.S. 438 (1964), argued 29 Apr. 1964, decided 22 June 1964 by vote of 5 to 4; Goldberg for the Court, Harlan, Stewart, White, and Clark in dissent. When Danny Escobedo, a murder suspect, was taken to the police station and put in an interrogation room, he repeatedly asked to speak to the lawyer he had retained.