Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. Petitioner, a layman, was undoubtedly unaware that under Illinois law an admission of 'mere' complicity in the murder plot was legally as damaging as an admission of firing of the fatal shots. Illinois v. Escobedo, 28 Ill.2d 41, 190 N.E.2d 825. The 'guiding hand of counsel' was essential to advise petitioner of his rights in this delicate ...

  3. The petitioner Danny Escobedo asked to speak with his lawyer while in police custody but before being formally charged and was denied. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Not allowing someone to speak with an attorney, and not advising them of their right to remain silent after they have been arrested and before they have been interrogated is a denial of ...

  4. FACTS. At 2:30 A.M. on January 20, 1960, police arrested Danny Escobedo, a twenty-two-year-old of Mexican extraction, for the murder of his brother-in-law. They attempted to interrogate him, but, on the advice of his counsel, Escobedo refused to make any statements and was released.

  5. In Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, we drew upon the rationale of Hamilton and Massiah in holding that the right to counsel was guaranteed at the point where the accused, prior to arraignment, was subjected to secret interrogation despite repeated requests to see his lawyer. Summary of this case from United States v. Wade

  6. ESCOBEDO v. ILLINOIS. ESCOBEDO v. ILLINOIS is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 22, 1964. The case was argued before the court on April 29, 1964. In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court and remanded the case for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion.

  7. During the interrogation of Escobedo, the police put Escobedo and Di Gerlando in the same room and during the confrontation, Escobedo implicated himself in the murder. The trial court convicted Escobedo and the Supreme Court of Illinois affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

  8. Jun 21, 2019 · June 21, 2019. During Constitutional Law Resource Month at the Harris County Law Library, we are taking a look back at a landmark Supreme Court decision, Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U.S. 478 (1964). Tomorrow marks the 55th anniversary of the decision and its role in reinforcing our Sixth Amendment rights.

  1. People also search for