Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Roger Ebert January 25, 1968. Tweet. Now streaming on: Powered by JustWatch. Yes, there are serious faults in Stanley Kramer's "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner," but they are overcome by the virtues of this delightfully old-fashioned film. It would be easy to tear the plot to shreds and catch Kramer in the act of copping out.

  2. Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, Stanley Kramer’s wildly popular attempt at social commentary on race relations in the 1960’s, is a very frustrating film to analyze. The movie’s single greatest—and completely impossible to ignore—flaw can also be argued as its greatest strength. The most important thing for modern audiences is to get the ...

    • Stanley Kramer
  3. People also ask

  4. Jul 21, 2007 · Stanley Kramer's Guess Who's Coming to Dinner features a masterclass in acting from Spencer Tracy, Sidney Poitier, and Katharine Hepburn. ... Kramer's film does feel like a dusty time capsule ...

  5. Roger Ebert January 21, 1968. Tweet. From "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner?" The first thing that happened to Stanley Kramer after he walked through the door of the Old Town Saloon was that a young lady said: "You Stanley Kramer? I hated your movie." "Caution, my dear," Kramer said. "Don't get irregular before your time."

  6. Jan 8, 2022 Full Review Nicholas Bell IONCINEMA.com Kramer's film does feel like a dusty time capsule. Still, as a film starring some of cinemas greatest actors, the combination of Hepburn ...

    • (38)
    • Spencer Tracy
    • Stanley Kramer
    • Columbia Pictures Corporation
  7. Box office. $56.7 million [2] Guess Who's Coming to Dinner is a 1967 American romantic comedy-drama film produced and directed by Stanley Kramer, and written by William Rose. It stars Spencer Tracy (in his final role), Sidney Poitier, and Katharine Hepburn, and features Hepburn's niece Katharine Houghton . The film was one of the few of the ...

  8. Jul 27, 2020 · Film: “Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner” (1967), directed by Stanley Kramer, is very much a film of it’s time, reflecting on things that seem impossible sixty years later – and yet, it still remains incredibly fresh in many aspects. One of the bolder choices that this film makes is to confront the white liberal population on the ...