Search results
Aug 29, 2012 · The jury found that, in 24 of its phones and tablets, Samsung had infringed on all three utility patents and three of four design patents that Apple had asserted. The jury rejected Samsung’s defense that the patents were invalid.
Oct 11, 2016 · SCOTUSblog Coverage. Opinion analysis: Justices tread narrow path in rejecting $400 million award for Samsung’s infringement of Apple’s cellphone design patents (Ronald Mann, December 6, 2016) Argument analysis: Justices cautious about resolving Samsung-Apple dispute over design of cell phones (Ronald Mann, October 13, 2016)
Oct 22, 2017 · The jury found that Samsung had infringed the D'677, D'087, and D'305 patents, Apple's utility patents, and Apple's trade dress. Id. The jury awarded approximately $1.049 billion to Apple on its infringement and trade dress claims. Id. After trial, Samsung moved for judgment as a matter of law. ECF No. 2013.
May 14, 2012 · Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Elec. Co., Ltd., No. 12-1105 (Fed. Cir. 2012) Apple claimed that Samsung smartphones, the Galaxy S and the Infuse, and its Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet infringed four Apple patents. Apple sought a preliminary injunction to block importation and U.S. sales.
Oct 11, 2016 · Apple and Samsung will appear before the US Supreme Court on Tuesday to argue why their opponent was wrong when it came to a patent case from 2012. This is the first time a design patent case...
Get Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 786 F.3d 983 (2015), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
Sep 17, 2015 · Justia Opinion Summary. Apple has multiple patents for features of the iPhone and, in 2012, sued Samsung, alleging infringement of five patents directed to smartphone and tablet interfaces. The district court held on summary judgment that Samsung infringed the 172 patent.
